In what I would call a confirmation of the law, not a NEW ruling, the US Supreme Court One lays down the law for all to see, and USE if you choose.
One of the BIG legal fantasies promoted by governments and officials is the idea of officials’ having ‘immunity’ from prosecution and no liability… so they are not held liable for their corrupt and illegal actions.
Don’t buy the LIE.
Judges are liable, cops are liable, corporate officers are liable, ANY official is liable… when:
1. if they perform any actions while in office, not defined by their office, or
2. actions that are defined by their office but are done in BAD faith or
3. the actions taken are illegal by nature.
Any actions that they take NOT defined by their office or illegal by their nature are considered to have been done outside of their office therefore done in their private capacity and therefore they are fully liable, in their private capacity, without any protections of their office.
Unfortunately this lie of ‘immunity’ is also repeated unknowingly by people, again and again, who have a real case against government officials and therefore do not pursue very valid claims.
A recent US Supreme Court decision clarified and confirmed that the government and their agents can be held liable and accountable for wrongdoing carried out by officials in its employment while on the job. Continue reading US Supreme Court Rules Government Officers Liable
Check out this article on the Supreme Court of Canada re confirming what the Canadian Judicial Council went to the trouble of researching and reporting on… the need and obligation to assist unrepresented people, by judges and court staff.
Your rights and your right to justice require them to assist you in court process otherwise the process is void.
ARTICLE HERE CLICK TO ACCESS
I talk to a lot of people about court process on a variety of issues where they are being prosecuted. One of the primary, most important, priority focus, really, really important things I say over and over and over again to each… when speaking or writing… stay focused on requiring proof of the jurisdiction and standing of the party making the claim.
Here’s a good summary: There is almost always no evidence that the person charged was required to act/ to have a licence etc. and there is almost always no evidence the “crown” has any standing to bring a charge before the court…so “they” withdraw (usually after dragging it out as long as possible).
That is real law in action… if you can stay on point. If you can stay on point. If you can stay on point. Make them prove they have jurisdiction, standing and evidence.
There is nothing usually to defend because the claim/complaint is almost always made without evidence (presumptions are not evidence) AND the party making the claim/complaint lacks jurisdiction over the accused and lacks standing to bring the matter before a court.
“They” win usually because people rarely challenge the foundation of the claim/complaint. No foundation equals no case.
The foundation is ALWAYS jurisdiction, standing and evidence. If even one is lacking the case is over before it starts.
Raise these three issues and NEVER Continue reading Focus on the Real Issues: The Foundation of their Case
Members only webinar:
How to Open a Private, No ID Bank Account
Not a member? It’s free… go here
The Criminal Charging Procedure in Canada
Live Workshop and Webinar Broadcast
Download FLYER: CLEAR May 31, 2014 Workshop + Webinar on laying criminal charges
Part of keeping public servants and other “officers” accountable REQUIRES the unhappy/harmed man or woman speaking up when you are treated improperly via:
- administrative complaints for official record and internal investigation and hopefully correction,
- common law claims for damage and remedy to you
- criminal complaint for punishment and deterrent
All three steps are available and required to keep public servants and other “officers” accountable. Failure to use these legal, lawful and recognized processes invites wrongdoers to continue their wrongful actions.
We all have a duty to “keep the peace” which includes reporting and acting as a witness against wrongdoers.
We cover the first two steps here on private-person.com David-Kevin: Lindsay covers the third step. I encourage everyone to understand the principles and process of laying criminal charges as well.
As reported here on this website “the system” tends to not charge, or undercharge, “system Continue reading Laying Criminal Charges Course
It’s time. Are you ready?
Enough is known about the way the present legal, banking and governmental systems work to start taking action. Are you up for it?
If playing Dungeons and Dragons, video games, extreme sports or joining the military to get your thrills has FINALLY ceased to be of interest because you KNOW that those games are only distractions for the REAL game of life… achieving your personal freedom…then now is the time to get serious and take action.
What kind of action?
Peaceful, responsible, standing in the truth, strength and action with honour.
That’s right, the type of action most people run screaming from.
Are you still here?
If you are tired of theories, guru bravado and half baked ideas from well meaning researchers AND you are ready to take action yourself stay tuned… you must be a free member of this website to read the rest of this post… go ahead and join for free – get in the private with other like minded folks…
***** FREE MEMBER LEVEL ONLY CONTENT! You can sign up as Free Member to get access! *****
The main focus of this website has been to investigate and share info on ‘common law’ and ‘private person’ status in common law. I was recently introduced to another fellow sharing his research and actual in court application stories about common law.
Many folks teach theories they have never applied, that’s my first test to see how credible the theory is. Karl Lentz speaks of his many applications and court experience with common law.
My personal journey REALLY hit high gear when I took someone else’s research and applied it BEFORE I fully understood the legal basis or the potential consequences. I suggest people study, understand and get the full story BEFORE they commit to actions that may lead to extended legal hassles and more.
Some theories are great and they do work….sorta…then “they” change tactic and ignore it next time waiting to see if you know what to do next. No next step? You lose.
I cover the “next step” in the course 3- H4J: Your Complaint IS Their Restraint – learn how to make your claim properly to hold them to account and get remedy but it was missing a final piece…
When I came across a video of Karl Lentz in the UK speaking about his research, understanding and application of the common law and making common law claims I liked what I heard and it fit very well with what I had been researching, sharing here and seeing in my court processes first hand.
I’ll be presenting my understanding of what Karl’s process Continue reading Karl Lentz and Common Law Claims