Restore the Bank of Canada To It’s Proper Purpose
In the long slow, persistent march by the "international bankers" to take control of every…
Robb Ryder is doing some really interesting research and has a few people “testing” the processes. I encourage you to visit his website and tune in to what he is doing.
TAKE NOTE : the fellow had a judgement AGAINST him and FOR the Bank for $182k +++ in January 2013…..ONE MONTH LATER after filing a PRAECIPE…. judgement FOR the fellow and AGAINST the Bank for “not filing a valid lawful complaint”.
a Judgment of NON PROS against the Plaintiffs (Bank) for not submitting a valid complaint
praecipe for reconsideration of prior judgment
possibly prosecution for a malicious prosecution by Plaintiff (Bank)
If you are in foreclosure or have been…one fellow appears to be on the road to remedy…but this process should work for most invalid complaint actions (which is most….)
Bob in PA and his Judgment of NON PROS
Yes, Yes, Yes….. Bob in PA… after 2.5 years in foreclosure.. tons of paper… trial in court of common pleas… that ended in an adjournment ..followed by a judgment (rendered during adjournment) from a non-jury trial that included a verdict (decision of a jury)…. finding for the plaintiff (bank)….
Ends up with a Judgment of NON PROS against the Plaintiffs… for not submitting a valid complaint…. using their “Rules”.. and a couple of praecipes…..
Next is a praecipe for reconsideration of prior judgment for the plaintiff for a RULE 236 infraction… as the “Judgment” did not include the names and addresses of the parties… as required by the rule… could be writ of error or similar… and have the subject matter of the foreclosure (Rights , title, interest) returned to the defendant…. and possibly prosecution for a malicious prosecution by Plaintiff (Bank)… Work in progress…
Go… learn… do and let us all know how it goes,