Digital Photocopiers Can Be Deadly to Your Privacy
Did you know that all digital photocopiers have a hard drive disk? That hard drive…
Immigration Minister Jason Kenney said Federal Court judges weren’t toeing the line of the Harper government’s immigration policies.
Hmmm. Say what?
A minister of the government thinks it is the role of judges is to serve the government’s “policies” instead of uphold the law.
I wonder if that attitude is prevalent in the hearts and minds of government minions? What do you think?
Apparently in a speech causing some controversy last February to the law faculty at the University of Western Ontario, Kenney said Federal Court judges, who preside over immigration cases, weren’t doing enough to help the government remove immigrants with alleged criminal pasts, and other unwanted refugees, from Canada.
He accused judges of delaying such cases in the court, and of “heavy-handed” interference in decisions made by immigration department officials.
Rod Snow, the CBA’s president, “Your public criticism of judges who follow the law but not the government’s political agenda is an affront to our democracy and freedoms,” Snow said in a letter to Kenney. “Judges cannot enter the public arena to respond to criticism.”
On Saturday, McLachlin entered the arena herself, saying: “We live in a society with a strong commitment to the rule of law, and one of the elements of our commitment to the rule of law is a deep, cultural belief in and confidence in the judiciary.
“This goes beyond a general idea that we have good judges of integrity, it’s the confidence that brings litigants to choose the courts as a forum for resolving their disputes . . . and it is what allows them to accept the resulting judgments.
“Citizens have to have the confidence that whatever their problem, whoever’s on the other side . . . they will have a judge who will give them impartial justice and not be subject to pressures to direct their judgments in a particular way,” she said.
Nice to know the Supreme court chief justice considers that the “rule of law” trumps government policy (aka public policy). If only government employees considered the law more important than government policy.