Defending A Taxpayer’s Right to Taxable and Exempt Incomes
Session #1 webinar is available to view below without donation (to members only). You will see the webinar below when you are logged into the website. (Not a member yet click here.)
NOTE: this webinar deals with in-the-box taxpayer defensive processes – if you wish to act as the representative of a taxpayer you can fight and win, sometimes…
***** FREE MEMBER LEVEL ONLY CONTENT! You can sign up as Free Member to get access! *****
To view Session #2 + #3 webinar recordings there is a requested donation.
If you have donated, the next 2 sessions are visible below…
MEMBERS ONLY CONTENT! Please sign up to see it!
This discussion is ideal for those who want to assert their taxpayer’s intent to income from a source (taxable income) , or not from a source (exempt income), or a combination of both. This stops them from buttonholing you with the so-called “natural person argument”. Ideally you should be aware of this knowledge before being under audit or investigation.
Discussion Led by: Eric X
- Having problems getting your taxpayer’s costs accepted as expenses?
- Stressed out over being prosecuted in court for paying too much tax?
- Feeling down and unpatriotic because you’re not paying your fair share?
We will discuss:
- Convincing others that your taxable income is not exempt income
- Demolishing their assumptions that you have no taxable income
- What is the standard of proof in tax law
- How onus of proof shifts in tax law – and how to reverse that onus
- Why is the tax system self-assessing
- Why most taxpayers focus on the wrong issue when prosecuted
- The reason you use to put a trial into abeyance – at the beginning
- What are statements of fact, statements of law, and of mixed fact and law – and why it is important to know the difference
- What court case says that accounting records is not reality
- When to lay in your evidence of having taxable income
- When the assessment process is really over
Discussion will be by power-point slides and will be illustrated with Canadian case law. It will be recorded and accessible online at www.private-person.com after the discussion dates so that if you are unable to attend you can review it anytime later at your leisure.
Email Eric directly knosin (at) me.com with questions and regarding the course or your donation.
Suggested Donation: $300
Accept cash, gas cards, prepaid visa or MasterCard
In Week 2 we go over case law that backs up what was outlined in Week 1.
In Week 3 we will go over actual paperwork, as well as paperwork that had them abandon a proposal.
I’m trying to make the concepts simpler and am trying to make it SHORTER, not longer!
I’m also going to show a few strategies that Crown has up its sleeves – and how to (hopefully) address them.
For example: if you appeal, it gives life to the re-assessment, thus allowing Crown to make new assumptions all over again. How should we deal with that?
Another example: Crown can plead assumptions in the alternative. I found only 8 cases in all of Canada on this, but it’s a tactic that they do pull out of the hat from time to time, so we should address that also.