Robb Ryder is doing some really interesting research and has a few people “testing” the processes. I encourage you to visit his website and tune in to what he is doing.<\/p>\n
TAKE NOTE : the fellow had a judgement AGAINST him and FOR the Bank for $182k +++ in January 2013…..ONE MONTH LATER after filing\u00a0 a PRAECIPE…. judgement FOR the fellow and AGAINST the Bank for “not filing a valid lawful complaint”<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n a Judgment of NON PROS against the Plaintiffs (Bank) for not submitting a valid complaint<\/strong><\/p>\n praecipe for reconsideration of prior judgment<\/strong><\/p>\n possibly prosecution for a malicious prosecution by Plaintiff (Bank)<\/strong><\/p>\n If you are in foreclosure or have been…one fellow appears to be on the road to remedy…but this process should work for most invalid complaint actions (which is most….)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n RobbRyder here\u2026<\/p>\n Yes, Yes, Yes\u2026.. Bob in PA\u2026 after 2.5 years in foreclosure.. tons of paper\u2026 trial in court of common pleas\u2026 that ended in an adjournment ..followed by a judgment (rendered during adjournment) from a non-jury trial that included a verdict (decision of a jury)\u2026. finding for the plaintiff (bank)\u2026.<\/p>\n Ends up with a Judgment of NON PROS against the Plaintiffs\u2026 for not submitting a valid complaint\u2026. using their \u201cRules\u201d.. and a couple of praecipes\u2026..<\/p>\n Next is a praecipe for reconsideration of prior judgment for the plaintiff for a RULE 236 infraction\u2026 as the \u201cJudgment\u201d did not include the names and addresses of the parties\u2026 as required by the rule\u2026 could be writ of error or similar\u2026 and have the subject matter of the foreclosure (Rights , title, interest) returned to the defendant\u2026. and possibly prosecution for a malicious prosecution by Plaintiff (Bank)\u2026 Work in progress\u2026<\/p>\n\n
Bob in PA and his Judgment of NON\u00a0PROS<\/h2>\n