{"id":1473,"date":"2011-11-09T10:49:47","date_gmt":"2011-11-09T18:49:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/private-person.com\/blog\/?page_id=1473"},"modified":"2020-10-03T14:48:25","modified_gmt":"2020-10-03T21:48:25","slug":"hope-for-justice-workshop","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/private-person.com\/blog\/training\/hope-for-justice-workshop\/","title":{"rendered":"Hope For Justice Workshops"},"content":{"rendered":"

Yes, There is a REAL Hope For Justice<\/strong><\/em><\/h1>\n

Hope For Justice<\/em> is a workshop series that explores the idea, and provides the evidence, that there are two different courts in British Columbia<\/strong> (and all common law jurisdictions). Our understanding of how to communicate with, and how to administratively complain<\/strong> to “the system” and make common law claims<\/strong>, will help keep courts, police, public servants, governments and corporations accountable to restore balance to our society.<\/strong><\/p>\n

We begin reviewing multiple court cases, transcripts,\u00a0personal witness testimony of court events and the history of the court system in B.C. which together create a compelling case that common law courts are alive, well and little used in B.C. and probably all common law jurisdictions.<\/p>\n

\n

I’ve been through the H4J: In Action<\/em> course twice<\/strong> now, and am now working through the H4J Do Common Law Courts \u00a0Exist?<\/em> material… just awesome<\/strong>…Warmest Regards – KI<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

One of the key pre-trial and trials that dramatically demonstrated the apparent existence and operation of a common law court is through understanding ALL of the events and legal games that occurred before, during and after the first trial of Russ Porisky in Chilliwack and Abbotsford, British Columbia during 1999\/2000.<\/p>\n

NOTE:<\/span><\/strong> During Porisky’s first trial in 1999\/2000 he successfully utilized “natural person” status as demonstrated in fully explored in Hope For Justice 1 – Common Law Courts Exist<\/strong><\/em><\/a> course. Don’t believe half truths and rumours, get the WHOLE story here.<\/p>\n

Porisky’s recent second, subsequent trial, on tax evasion charges in 2011\/2012, he never raised nor utilized “natural person” as a position prior to trial. He accepted the courts jurisdiction over him as the taxpayer and argued ITA interpretations….\u00a0a completely different approach from the first trial on different charges.<\/p>\n

The first trial he was successfully acquitted once the judge “made up” a technicality to acquit on. The second trial ended with a conviction and jail time. Maybe its a good idea to REALLY study what happened the first time and not listen to rumours or half truths about that first trial? For the WHOLE story study Hope For Justice<\/em><\/a>, its free to go access, for private-person.com members.<\/strong><\/p>\n

(June 2014 UPDATE<\/strong><\/span> – Russ had an appeal of his conviction heard Oct. 31, 2013,\u00a0decision\u00a0took until\u00a0April 2014 where the original trial was voided and a new trial ordered. The technical reason for the decision\u00a0was a 2-1 split decision that was very weak in my opinion. http:\/\/www.courts.gov.bc.ca\/jdb-txt\/CA\/14\/01\/2014BCCA0146.htm )<\/em><\/p>\n

<\/h3>\n

After We Understand a Common Law Court Exists Then What?<\/h3>\n

After studying the idea that justice really may be found in common law courts, we need to understand how to properly address the legal processes that we are faced with everyday that move us out of common law into another type of law.<\/p>\n

The follow up course Hope For Justice: In Action<\/em><\/strong> explores the ways we are being communicated to and tricked into abandoning the common law. We need to understand how to interpret what is happening and how to respond appropriately.<\/span><\/p>\n

The final course Hope For Justice: Your Complaint Is Their Restraint<\/em><\/strong> explores the legal and operational idea that we as individuals are responsible for holding public servants, officials and corporations accountable<\/span>. We can only do that if we realize that we have the power, the right, the duty and the process to do so effectively.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

1. Hope For Justice – Do Common Law Courts Exist? (H4J:1)
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n

Getting to the point of understanding that common law courts exist and how to access the common law courts is the reason this first course was created. \u00a0We attempt to connect various events in many court cases in a way that makes sense, provides evidence for the basic premise and encourage the hope and demonstrate that there is an active, honourable common law court system that we can access, where real honour and justice may be found.<\/p>\n

You will come to understand that:<\/p>\n