A lawyer, who has a law school named after him, the Peter A. Allard School of Law at the University of British Columbia, Canada, also has a $100,000 prize awarded to “awarded biennially to an individual, movement or organization that has demonstrated exceptional courage and leadership in combating corruption or protecting human rights, especially through promoting transparency, accountability and the Rule of Law”.
In what I would call a confirmation of the law, not a NEW ruling, the US Supreme Court One lays down the law for all to see, and USE if you choose.
One of the BIG legal fantasies promoted by governments and officials is the idea of officials’ having ‘immunity’ from prosecution and no liability… so they are not held liable for their corrupt and illegal actions.
Don’t buy the LIE.
Judges are liable, cops are liable, corporate officers are liable, ANY official is liable… when:
1. if they perform any actions while in office, not defined by their office, or
2. actions that are defined by their office but are done in BAD faithor
3. the actions taken are illegal by nature.
Any actions that they take NOT defined by their office or illegal by their nature are considered to have been done outside of their office therefore done in their private capacity and therefore they are fully liable, in their private capacity, without any protections of their office.
Unfortunately this lie of ‘immunity’ is also repeated unknowingly by people, again and again, who have a real case against government officials and therefore do not pursue very valid claims.
Join jd and Robert Marques as Robert gives an overview/intro to the principles of how to stop debt collectors and even how to get paid for holding the debt collectors accountable when they operate in ways that break the law.
Robert discusses the principles of how to invalidate the debt and STOP debt collectors cold despite the tactics they employ.
I talk to a lot of people about court process on a variety of issues where they are being prosecuted. One of the primary, most important, priority focus, really, really important things I say over and over and over again to each… when speaking or writing… stay focused on requiring proof of the jurisdiction and standing of the party making the claim.
Here’s a good summary: There is almost always no evidence that the person charged was required to act/ to have a licence etc. and there is almost always no evidence the “crown” has any standing to bring a charge before the court…so “they” withdraw (usually after dragging it out as long as possible).
That is real law in action… if you can stay on point. If you can stay on point. If you can stay on point. Make them prove they have jurisdiction, standing and evidence.
There is nothing usually to defend because the claim/complaint is almost always made without evidence (presumptions are not evidence) AND the party making the claim/complaint lacks jurisdiction over the accused and lacks standing to bring the matter before a court.
“They” win usually because people rarely challenge the foundation of the claim/complaint. No foundation equals no case.
The foundation is ALWAYS jurisdiction, standing and evidence. If even one is lacking the case is over before it starts.
This excerpt of a longer news video tells a story on many levels of the power of the people and the effect of public exposure on wrongdoers actions is the path to change for the better. Nanaimo makes big news. The backtracking and double talk by the mayor is funny and sad at the same time. (must watch the whole video below)
B.C. is the hotbed for lots of interesting events, including this latest one Nanaimo City Council following the new-world-order-anti-Christian-attitude they get some blow back and have now bigtime backtracked with a financial payout for their wrongdoing.
People also stood up against the Harmonized Sales Tax (HST). B.C.’ites gave the HST the heave ho a few years back…did no one notice???? Proof positive of
YOUR power…an the process that works.
Any and EVERY “law” passed by any and all elected representatives can be kicked to the curb by the people standing up and saying “no this is not acceptable”.
Two big events in First Nations’ land title/rights recognition this week from the Supreme Court of Canada and Vancouver city council. Is the timing coincidence? No and neither will the strategic games by lawyers be a surprise.