The main focus of this website has been to investigate and share info on ‘common law’ and ‘private person’ status in common law. I was recently introduced to another fellow sharing his research and actual in court application stories about common law.
Many folks teach theories they have never applied, that’s my first test to see how credible the theory is. Karl Lentz speaks of his many applications and court experience with common law.
My personal journey REALLY hit high gear when I took someone else’s research and applied it BEFORE I fully understood the legal basis or the potential consequences. I suggest people study, understand and get the full story BEFORE they commit to actions that may lead to extended legal hassles and more.
Some theories are great and they do work….sorta…then “they” change tactic and ignore it next time waiting to see if you know what to do next. No next step? You lose.
I cover the “next step” in the course 3- H4J: Your Complaint IS Their Restraint – learn how to make your claim properly to hold them to account and get remedy but it was missing a final piece…
When I came across a video of Karl Lentz in the UK speaking about his research, understanding and application of the common law and making common law claims I liked what I heard and it fit very well with what I had been researching, sharing here and seeing in my court processes first hand.
I’ll be presenting my understanding of what Karl’s process Continue reading Karl Lentz and Common Law Claims
how many statutes can you point to and say there it is ‘human being’ ?
how many statutes can you point to and say there it is ‘private person’ ?
how many statutes can you point to and say there it is ‘natural person’ ?
how many statutes can you point to and say there it is ‘man’ ?
Why would the lawmakers and draftsmen use one term over the other…at certain times….?
hmmmm… good question?
The previous post and video triggered a question from a reader which triggered me to ask the above question. Unlike many people (who have better things to do) I went looking for the answer – it’s called first hand, hard, grinding research (thank you internet and search tools).
What I found, after having a look, was shocking and raised more questions with some surprising possibilities…check out the video:
‘human’ related to marriage and animal acts
‘man’ related to marriage, army and navy acts
‘private person’ related to property acts
‘natural person’ related to insurance, banking, multiple acts and recognition that natural person has inherent rights, powers, privileges
Hopefully you will ask yourself some questions and take your first hand research and Continue reading ‘human being’, ‘private person’, ‘natural person’, ‘man’ in Statutes
Do you want “proof” that common law is alive and well in Canada?
Do you want to see how ‘person’, ‘private person” and ‘natural person’ are different and how they are used differently and the ‘private person’ is your powerful status in common law where your rights lay waiting for you to claim?
Click here to view a short video covering more key info and examples of ‘private person’ and ‘common law’.
For more detail and information:
The “system” seems to be in a bit of a bind and has resorted to shocking breeches of the “law” with the ultimate desired effect and goal, I’m sure, attempting to wear down the individual and their supporters.
If you beat a “slave” publicly it tends to be a warning heard and obeyed by most other “slaves” – it’s a tried and true formula for maintaining order. Sometimes it backfires and makes “slaves” harden their resolve.
Some of those in the “system” really do perceive they “own” you and it is their responsibility to keep you in line, or they know they are so guilty of crimes they will do almost anything to try and cover their crimes up.
Although some of the attitudes, actions and interpretations Dean or his followers may engage in, I don’t agree with, it is NOT OK to do as is being done to Dean. It is absolutely akin to political prisoner tactics in other supposedly less free countries than Canada.
The illusion of freedom and legitimate authority is wearing thin in many ways.
Hear Dean’s personal updates on these three audio phone calls from jail. Continue reading Dean Clifford From Jail UPDATE
Many people have taught and applied the “claim of right” law principle over recent years which WAS clearly laid out in the Criminal Code (Canada). Well it is mostly GONE. That’s right GONE, but not completely.
AND Notaries in B.C. have been warned by their Association to not notarize any claim of right documents….
The Criminal Code has been changed AGAIN and the “claim of right” sections have been REPEALED as of 2012.
You can blame the “freeman” and guys like Dean Clifford for spreading the word. LOL
NOTE: Remember “they” cannot remove rights because “they” never gave you any rights BUT “they” are bound to RESPECT the rights you have (unwritten rights mostly). A private person’s rights remain intact regardless of what “they” write in their “codes”. “They” deceive because they cannot deny the truth, only hide it…..
You see, when everyday people go read the law and start using it, the guys writing the laws go “OH SHIT!” Then “they” scurry about in their posh offices and re-write and re-number the laws that we the people have discovered do exist and which actually HELP people.
I saw this “changing the law to hide the truth” with Continue reading Claim of Right No Longer Available??