This is part two of a four part series, covering the events that occurred during the Russ Porisky pre-trial and trial in 2000.

This was recorded during a live full day workshop in Vancouver, B.C. in Summer 2010.

NOTE: all information is presented as private education and entertainment to invite thought and discussion, not provide legal advice, 'cause I ain't no lawyer, but I have an opinion if you care to hear it (in some countries it may even be safe to share an opinion without persecution).

2A - review of important legal concepts.
2B - review of the Porisky pre-trial circumstances and transcripts.
2C - review of the Porisky trial circumstances and transcripts.
2D - day review and discussion of possible conclusions.

Become a private member to access this content.

Password is emailed to you when you sign up HERE!

3 Responses to “H4J-Part 2 Porisky Pre-Trial and Trial Analysis”

1. Bill says:

   February 27, 2012 at 1:54 am

   I get Incorrect Password Please Try Again even though correct password is used – cannot unlock content. Thanks.
2. admin1 says:

   February 27, 2012 at 4:59 pm

   I sent you the password.
3. Bill says:

   February 28, 2012 at 3:07 am

   Thanks you.
   fwiw – An appeal is a process of civil law origin, and removes a cause entirely, subjecting the fact, as well as the law, to review and re-trial. A writ of error is a process of common law origin; and it removes nothing for re-examination, but the law.

   At common law the process for reviewing the judgments of the law courts was the writ of error. The appeal, which was borrowed from the civil law, and was unknown to the common law, was the appropriate method of obtaining a review of the decisions of the equity, admiralty and ecclesiastical courts.