A recent transcript came to light of a fellow in Ontario we'll refer to as "farmer George".

He was in engaged in a valient fight for his life in court trying to not accept the ALL CAPS NAME that they desperately wanted, needed and demanded he accept.

This webinar was a review of a section of a his court transcript where the issue of the NAME was spoken to directly. Both the Crown prosectuter and the judge are forceful in their demand for him to "accept" the NAME, "respond" to the NAME.

NOTHING could move forward until farmer George would accept the NAME....that is a clue.

Both officers of the court explain in plain language why they NEED him to accept the NAME on the Information and with the explanation the give why would anyone? BUT it does expose their game and fraud.

This transcript closes the loop on the previous Hope For Justice sections because we don't have to guess anymore about the result of accepting the NAME when the judge and the crown lay it out WHY they need you to accept the NAME on the Information (NAME vs Name - style - capitus diminitio media vs capitus diminitio minima).

As far as I'm concerned its the final nail in the coffin for the courts and their NAME game.

What do you think?